Saturday, March 14, 2009

How Safe Are We?

After recently talking with two pilots for a major airline, who are family friends, a scary reality was brought to my attention. They were discussing the fact that for today’s airlines it is not uncommon for a flight attendant’s salary to top a pilot’s. At first, I could not believe this a possibility due to the time, skill, and demand for pilots that their wages could have dropped to new lows. In the face of the current economy it is difficult for airlines to stay afloat especially after the fall they experienced post-9/11. However, due to pay cuts, wage freezes, and unions, pilots have sacrificed much more in terms of wage to keep their job than flight attendants have. The fact that the operators of aircraft have become second to flight attendants signifies a failure of airlines to provide safe transportation in exchange for higher profits.

Over break I flew on a ‘no-frills’ airline for the first time in over a decade, and I was very disappointed with the pilots’ ability to handle the airplane. As a pilot myself, I likely notice things that most travelers do not, and the pilots we much ‘sloppier’ than what I am used to out of my preferred airline. This budget-conscious airline edges the market on its ability to cut prices, however; I am afraid such measures are cutting the quality of the pilots and ultimately the passengers’ safety. I cannot think of anything more important than the safely of the traveler, and the problem extends past the pilots.

With companies’ efforts to reduce overhead it is likely to airlines cut corners in regards to safety. In response to 100 Southwest planes lacking mandatory safety inspections, the FAA made a push to step up its role in enforcing safety requirements. A month later, in April 2008, American Airlines was forced to cancel 2,500 flights because its planes were not deemed ‘airworthy.’ However, American Airlines was not alone, Southwest Airlines, United Airlines, Delta Air Lines, Alaska Airlines, and Midwest Airlines were are required to ground planes due to a lack of accordance with safety standards that same month. In light of the American Airlines crash in the Hudson River last month, the question regarding the airlines’ concern for safety is just as relevant.

With such cutthroat competition between airlines, companies cannot afford accidents because of scaring off customers. However, revenue has become so hard to come by that all aspects of service have fallen. Fliers realize when their in-flight snack and drink are taken away, when checked bags now incur a fee, and when regular fares skyrocket, but what customers don’t see is easier to hide. I think when airlines discuss charging fares based on passengers’ weight it should become clear that they are struggling. Although I cannot prove that airlines are lowering their safety standards, I think that it is the airlines number one responsibility to keep safety as the prime concern, and given the doubts that have arisen I feel they have failed.

2 comments:

  1. Good post. The crash of the regional plane in Buffalo shortly after the Hudson River incident brought into sharp contrast the difference between experienced pilots and inexperienced ones. Reading about the Buffalo crew made me not want to fly regional airlines anymore; is it possible they each had only about 400 hours of experience. I'm glad Sullenberger went to Congress to speak up about pilots' low pay. We really have to think about the consequences of the cut-throat competition among the airlines and really, the consequences of deregulation, if it is not accompanied by strict government oversight of safety.

    ReplyDelete
  2. This post immediately caught my eye because I am a very nervous flier. Flying is always very stressful for me, which is a pretty annoying fear since I fly all the time. I was actually going to blog about the crash into the Hudson River because it's such an amazing story. The article centered the piece around the pilot and called him a hero because of his incredible landing. It seems almost impossible that he was able to land a commercial jet in water without any fatalities.

    The article went on about his impressive background and how this is what ultimately saved the over one hundred passengers and crew members. It's really dumbfounding that airlines would compromise the safety factor of their planes, especially when they can't afford to scare off customers with crashes etc. They should be trying to attract the best and most experienced pilots to ensure the best safety. I'm okay with not getting a snack and drink if I know that I'm in better hands with a more experienced pilot and I think that most would agree. Airlines need to get their priorities in order and look at the situation with some humanity. When that plane takes off, they are responsible for peoples' family members. They should be viewed as more than customers, because if they mess up and are at fault, someone loses their mom or dad.

    Maybe by advertising how the airline's goal is to make traveling as safe as possible, they will attract more customers because people will be willing to pay more for something as vital as safety. Plus they will understand where there money is going so they won't feel like the heightened fees are just a way as blindly charging the most they can get.

    ReplyDelete